For the vast majority of ports and packages it won't make any difference whether they are installed are from head, quarterly and/or archives (in my experience, options dependencies aside). Isn't the issue here a dependency on the version of 'pkg' being enforced by 'pkg'? If so shouldn't this be fixed in 'pkg'?
Roger Marquis Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> The change that was made was having the default packages on releases point to >> quarterly branch of the ports tree. This was noted in the release note. > > Yes, but that really only helps people who already understand version > control. I'll try to come up with some text to add to the Handbook, > which currently assumes (for ports) that there is only head. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
