On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:59:59PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > ... > | and retried "portmaster -ad" (to builld/install the previously-failed > | misc/gimp-help-en); I still see a very similar-looking failure: > > I amended the UPDATING entry earlier today, adding: > > If your Perl package name is not called perl5-5.xx.y but perl5.xx-5.xx.y, > you > will need to rename it so that portupgrade doesn't get confused: > > pkg set -n perl5.xx:perl5
OK; did that (to all of my affected machines, so I would be less
likely to have an opportunity to forget); re-tried "portmaster -ad",
and: SUCCESS! :-)
...
===> Installing for en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_2
===> Checking if en-gimp-help-html already installed
===> Registering installation for en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_2
Installing en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_2...
===>>> Upgrade of en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_1 to en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_2
succeeded
===>>> Returning to update check of installed ports
===>>> Update check of installed ports complete
===>>> The following actions were performed:
Upgrade of en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_1 to en-gimp-help-html-2.8.1_2
Script done on Tue Sep 15 06:10:15 2015
g1-252(10.2-S)[7] echo $?
0
> Note that it's not a replacement for setting the DEFAULT_VERSION in
> make.conf.
Roger that. Already done (for all of the above-mentioned machines),
now that I know about the UPDATING entry.
> I'll add portmaster to the list, as it seems it's getting confused too. (It
> did not in my testing.)
Ah, well -- you tried. :-}
Thanks for your help!
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
