+--On 18 août 2015 14:53:31 +0200 Michelle Sullivan <miche...@sorbs.net> wrote: | Ports Index build wrote: |> Dear port maintainers, |> |> The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate |> LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique |> PKGNAME, e.g. by using PKGNAMESUFFIX. Note that NO_LATEST_LINK is |> deprecated. See the portmgr blog post for more information: |> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2013/10/03/package-name-collisions/ |> |> |> Thanks, |> Erwin "Annoying Reminder Guy III" Lansing |> |> |> LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER |> ======================================================================== |> == databases/postgresql-libpqxx3 20080111.freebsd....@ab.ote.we.lv |> devel/tortoisehg 6year...@gmail.com |> |> databases/p5-DBIx-SearchBuilder miche...@sorbs.net |> databases/pgpool-II-33 miche...@sorbs.net |> net/bmon miche...@sorbs.net |> www/p5-REST-Client miche...@sorbs.net |> www/py-collective.easytemplate miche...@sorbs.net |> www/py-collective.templateengines miche...@sorbs.net |> |> |> |> Total: 25123 ports |> | Epic misfire, or did I misread the intent?
Epic misfire, LATEST_LINK is gone, so, every port has the same, empty string, value. -- Mathieu Arnold
pgpE1PAYQDYKC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
