On 2015-07-07 11:29, Carmel NY wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:06:05 +0000, Brooks Davis stated:
We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of
turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with "build
everything by hand" which makes us look bad. I've been somewhat tempted to
adding a slave port mail/postfix-useful with SASL, TLS, and DANE turned on.
A less trollish name might be better though. :)
I agree. I use the "postfix-current" port with Dovecot, TLS, SASL and DANE.
However, Dovecot itself has a vast number of options that might make it
extremely hard to work out a usable slave-port.
The parts of Dovecot needed by Postfix are independent of all of the
options provided by the mail/dovecot2 port because Postfix literally
only needs the headers that define the dovecot-auth socket protocol. As
long as the version matches exactly, a custom build of dovecot2 will
drop in place of the stock dovecot2 without recompiling postfix.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
