On Wed, May 13, 2015, at 06:11, Carmel NY wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2015 01:24:35 +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt stated: > > [Truncated] > > The most reliable method to eliminate this, for lack of a better word > "bullshit", would be for FreeBSD to keep the "base" system "openssl" > version" up-to-date. It is apparent to even the most casual observer that > the present method of allowing to different versions of such an important > application on the same system without a fail proof method of choosing > which > version to use as you have demonstrated is truly counter productive to a > "stable" environment. > > Assuming that the FreeBSD developers won't do it, perhaps you might > investigate on how to replace the "base openssl" with the "port's > openssl" > version and eliminate the problem completely. > > By the way, I have run into this same nonsense myself. >
You can't do this without breaking the base system, so please don't try. The "correct" solution is for OpenSSL in base to be "private" so nothing else knows of its existence except the base system utilities that depend on it. There are plans for this to happen. I am not privy to a timeline. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
