On Sat, 09 May 2015 22:25:09 -0700 Yuri <y...@rawbw.com> wrote: > On 05/09/2015 03:56, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > > > I am wondering, if www/firefox really depends on security/openssl. > > According to the following, it should not: > > > > This stage-qa test that I submitted half year ago tests if some > package really depends on other packages, and recommends additions to > *_DEPENDS statements: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195203 > > So if it will say that USE_OPENSSL=yes is needed, this means FF does > depend on it. > > Yuri > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Thanks for your feedback. I have to admit that I am a bit lost with the referenced PR: - I do not know where to download final version of your patch. I strongly suppose it is https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151513 Will it give a file Mk/bsd.port.mk somewhere in the ports tree? But where? - I do not know how and against which to apply it. - Do you know, if it will be officially incorporated into FreeBSD - as a ports addition? - I do not know how to start a specific dependency check - let's say against www/firefox - with your patch. - And finally: If it turns out that www/firefox depends on security/openssl: In this case www/firefox doesn't honor the WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes switch in /etc/make.conf on my machine which is a www/firefox bug - isn't it? Hope you can give a brief summary. Peter _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
