On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: >> On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>>>>>>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local >>>>>>>> tree :o). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never noticed this since it never happened to me and nobody else >>>>>>> reported it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyway now that you draw my attention, yes, it needs fixing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your patch looks correct, but please allow me a little time for some >>>>>>> testing. >>>>>> OK thanks! :) >>>>> Just committed it. Thanks again for reporting the issue! >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> I don't want to abuse your time, but "make checksum" is broken on >>>> net/unison240 :). >>>> >>> Looks like distfiles were rerolled. 2.48 has the same problem. >>> >>> Will commit updated checksums shortly! >>> >>> Thanks again. >> I still get the same error Jeremie was getting with poudriere. >> >> I think the BUILD_DEPENDS should not be set unconditionally. The below >> patch fixes the problem for me. >> >> Does this look correct to you? >> >> Thanks, >> Geoff >> >> diff --git a/net/unison/Makefile b/net/unison/Makefile >> index 7404beb..461ebab 100644 >> --- a/net/unison/Makefile >> +++ b/net/unison/Makefile >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ COMMENT?= User-level file synchronization tool >> >> LICENSE= GPLv3 >> >> -BUILD_DEPENDS= ocamlc:${PORTSDIR}/lang/ocaml >> + >> >> PLIST_SUB= PORTVERSION=${PORTVERSION} >> USES= gmake >> @@ -38,11 +38,13 @@ OPTIONS_DEFAULT?= DOCS X11 >> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MX11} >> MAKE_ARGS+= UISTYLE=gtk2 >> PLIST_SUB+= TEXT="" >> +BUILD_DEPENDS= ocamlc:${PORTSDIR}/lang/ocaml >> BUILD_DEPENDS+= lablgtk2:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/ocaml-lablgtk2 \ >> icotool:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/icoutils >> RUN_DEPENDS+= lablgtk2:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/ocaml-lablgtk2 >> SUB_FILES+= ${PORTNAME}.desktop >> .else >> +BUILD_DEPENDS= ocamlc:${PORTSDIR}/lang/ocaml-nox11 >> MAKE_ARGS+= UISTYLE=text >> PLIST_SUB+= TEXT="@comment " >> PKGMESSAGE= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-message.nox11 >> > This is the same as the port was before the latest patch. > > (having BUILD_DEPENDS= followed by BUILD_DEPENDS+= is semantically the > same as one unified BUILD_DEPENDS+=) > > Please send me your build log. I need to understand what is going on. > Can you also tell me what other ports you are building in the same > poudriere run together with unison? I'm interested in other ports which > depend on ocaml. Maybe there is some other port in the tree with the > same problem unison had, which are unmasked by my latest patch. > > BTW I'm going to investigate the option of modifying ocaml port > behavior, I'm not sure it is really correct anymore. >
I can send you the build logs, but no, it's not the same as before the patch. Note the dependency is changed to lang/ocaml-nox11 instead of lang/ocaml. That is, we depend on lang/ocaml when the X11 option is enabled, and lang/ocaml-nox11 when the X11 option is not enabled. If you still think there is no difference, I will send you full build logs both with and without the patch. Thanks, Geoff _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"