On 09/25/14 14:56, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/2014 3:35 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's
>>> ability to build legacy package repos?
>>
>> No. Poudriere still supports it as long as you're using an older ports
>> tree.
>>
>
> Given that, is the expectation that the below workflow would produce an 8.4
> package repo? Unfortunately, it did not.
>
> After creating an 8.4-RELEASE jail and an older, equivalent Ports tree as
> follows...
>
> # poudriere jail -c -j 8_4-amd64 -v 8.4-RELEASE -a amd64
> # poudriere ports -c -p 8_4-amd64 -m svn+http -B branches/RELEASE_8_4_0
I think you should grab ports with the tag PKG_INSTALL_EOL (-B
tag/PKG_INSTALL_EOL)
That's the last revision at which the ports tree supported old pkg_tools.
>
> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/8_4-amd64-make.conf:
>
> WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes
> PERL_VERSION=5.14.4
> OPTIONS_UNSET="X11 GTK2"
>
> .if ${.CURDIR:M*/shells/bash}
> EXTRA_PATCHES+= /distfiles/local-patches/8_4-amd64/bash.patch
> .endif
>
> note: above .if added to the make.conf according to the link provided below
>
> Executing poudriere bulk, as follows, results in no packages built due to
> numerous stage failures subsequently resulting in a bunch of skipped builds
> due to these failures.
>
> # poudriere bulk -j 8_4-amd64 -f $package_file -p 8_4-amd64
>
> =======================<phase: stage >============================
> make: don't know how to make stage. Stop
>
You took ports tagged for 8.4 release, which happened quite some time
ago, I don't think the ports tree had stage support at the time.
--
Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
