On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> On 2014-07-23, Matthew Seaman <m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > > > 'pkg version' priorities changed between repository catalogue, ports > > index and generating the info out of the ports tree directly. Now if > > you have an INDEX file, pkg version will read that for preference, as > > it's only about a zillion times faster than what it used to do, which > > involves running make(1) in a bunch of ports. > > > > If you want the old behaviour either delete the INDEX file or use the -P > > flag. > > -P does most certainly not provide the old behavior. pkg version > took a few seconds, now it takes two minutes on the same machine. > > -- > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de > If 'pkg version' only took a few seconds for you, I suspect you had very few ports installed. It has always taken minutes for me. That said, '-P' is much slower than the old default, even though it is doing as close as possible to the same thing. I suspect the slow-down is due to the overhead of the solver. The solver fixes many potential pkgdb issues, but it is probably a rather slow fix. Perhaps that is why use of the index is now the default. I have been using '-I since moving to pkgng because it is almost instant... far faster then the old package system. Is there a reason you want to avoid using the index? It's worked just fine for me for several months on systems with well over 1000 ports installed. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
