>>>On 2014-07-22 17:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:> sysutils/py-salt has been broken >>>for the last couple of weeks. The >>>> resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a >>>> result, py-salt crashed on startup. There a PR in bugzilla for this: >>>> >>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191986 >>>> >>>>>From what I can tell, this problem has been fixed by this commit: >>>> >>>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=362364 >>>> >>>> So py-salt will need to be rebuilt in the freebsd pkgng repo, but because >>>> the fix was in bsd.python.mk, the port will need to have PORTREVISION >>>> bumped in order to flush out the broken version from the pkgng repo. >>>> >>>> I've attached a list of other ports which may also be broken (i.e. ports >>>> whose makefiles include the text USE_PYDISTUTILS but not >>>> PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST). Some of these ports may also need to rebuilt, but >>>> without testing each one of them individually, it may not be be possible to >>>> tell which. >>>> >>>> Could someone consider doing a mass commit to each of these ports to bump >>>> PORTREVISION so that any potential breakage is flushed out of the pkg >>>> repos? >>>>
Sorry, my mobile has taken the discussion out of list ... >>>> isn't it easier to bump python instead ? >>> yep sure would, but that will force a rebuild of ~2700 ports instead of 300. >> I suspect even more then the 2300 ports (depening ports also counting) but >> this way really everything will be cached. >> Dont know if the snap for weekly build was already taken if not it would be >> an option > > tbh, i'm not familiar enough with the main repo build process + > consequences to be able to assess how best to deal with this. > Best to address this also to portmgr@ for decicission (added to CC) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
