> On Jun 1, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de> wrote: > > On 2014-05-31, Mark Linimon <lini...@lonesome.com> wrote: > >>> I forgot I had the DOCS option unset as it was unset ages ago >>> and updates have always worked. The question is "why are changes >>> to a port committed without proper testing?" Yes, "proper >>> testing" should include testing of the effects of (un)setting >>> individual Makefile options. >> >> The number of combinations is huge. >> >> It's just not feasible. > > Which is a good argument that options should be minimized. Instead, > ports policy appears to be to make as many options as possible. :-(
True. At least a subset should be marked as "must work". Setting most options would be best. > > -- > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
