Once again I am seeing this dreadful list and once again I am wondering... Why
are we removing ports simply for being "unmaintained"?
Those with build-errors -- Ok, I understand, bit-rot happens. Those with (much)
newer versions available -- sure.
But simply "unmaintained" -- that does not seem right...
graphics/qvplay is just an example -- linimon's list contains many more ports,
whose only "fault" is not having an active maintainer...
-mi
On 07.04.2014 07:06, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
> portname: graphics/qvplay
> description: Digital camera downloading tool for Casio QV series
> maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
> deprecated because: Unmaintained since 2001
> expiration date: 2014-04-12
> build errors: none.
> overview:
> http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=qvplay
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
