Am 08.02.2014 11:31, schrieb John Marino: > On 2/8/2014 11:26, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points >> for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the >> chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages. >> >> Not sure what other changes to the infrastructure are required >> (Mk/bsd.port.mk needs to be taught to build more than one package from >> the STAGEDIR), but it's not impossible that we'll see features as Lev >> desires, later, as "perhaps in 2015". >> >> And libgcc_s is a dependency you get on practically every port that is >> compiled with a newer GCC. > > Are you sure this is still true? Now that FreeBSD supports > dl_iterate_phdr (and has for a few years now), gcc exceptions are > handled through rtld, not libgcc_s. I suspect that newer FreeBSD > releases have packages without this linked library. Is there another > reason to see libgcc_s used these days?
Never bothered to check. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
