On 19/12/13 21:41 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:04:10 +0100 > John Marino <freebsd.cont...@marino.st> wrote: > > > On 12/19/2013 06:54, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > you got the point. We have to assume that a port which is not marked > > > broken has to work. > > > > I build the entire port tree several times a month. I can tell you > > from experience that this assumption is not valid. > > so, you want to say, that all the little problems which are solved > mainly by people who are not the maintainer should become PRs?
IMHO, it's the only way to reach quality in the port tree with a very accurate traceability. regards, - rodrigo _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
