Okay, now I am confused. How can my workaround work for three quadrants
of {8.4,9.2} x {amd64,i386} and fail for just one combination?
Gerald
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Ports-QAT wrote:
> Work around ports infrastructure breakage introduced with staging and
> remove info/gcc46 ourselves.
>
> Reported by: QAT, amdmi3, mandree, bf, dbn
> PR: 184178
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Build ID: 20131122220400-1181
> Job owner: ger...@freebsd.org
> Buildtime: 2 hours
> Enddate: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:19:05 GMT
>
> Revision: r334619
> Repository:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=334619
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Port: lang/gcc46 4.6.4_1,1
>
> Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
> Buildstatus: SUCCESS
> Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~ger...@freebsd.org/20131122220400-1181-230452/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
>
> Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
> Buildstatus: SUCCESS
> Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~ger...@freebsd.org/20131122220400-1181-230453/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
>
> Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
> Buildstatus: SUCCESS
> Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~ger...@freebsd.org/20131122220400-1181-230454/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
>
> Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
> Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS
> Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~ger...@freebsd.org/20131122220400-1181-230455/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
>
>
> --
> Buildarchive URL: <https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20131122220400-1181>
> redports <https://qat.redports.org/>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
