17.11.2013 02:55, Eitan Adler пишет:
> What do people think of something like the following? This would
> allow users to compile specific ports with debugging capabilities.
I vote for this change. thanks!
> Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk
> ===================================================================
> --- Mk/bsd.port.mk (revision 333538)
> +++ Mk/bsd.port.mk (working copy)
> @@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ FreeBSD_MAINTAINER= port...@freebsd.org
> # passed to the compiler by setting DEBUG_FLAGS. It
> is
> # set to "-g" at default.
> #
> +# WITH_DEBUG_PORTS - A list of origins for which
> WITH_DEBUG will be set
> +#
> # WITH_SSP_PORTS
> # - If set, SSP_FLAGS (defaults to
> -fstack-protector)
> # is added to CFLAGS and the necessary flags
> @@ -1303,6 +1305,10 @@ MAKE_ENV+= TMPDIR="${TMPDIR}"
> CONFIGURE_ENV+= TMPDIR="${TMPDIR}"
> .endif # defined(TMPDIR)
>
> +.if defined(WITH_DEBUG_PORTS) && ${WITH_DEBUG_PORTS:M${PKGORIGIN}}
> +WITH_DEBUG= yes
> +.endif
> +
> # Reset value from bsd.own.mk.
> .if defined(WITH_DEBUG) && !defined(WITHOUT_DEBUG)
> STRIP= #none
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
