On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:53:24 -0700 Ade Lovett articulated: > On 8/13/2013 12:29, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > OK, fine. > > > > And what should we replace it with on a production 9.2-PRERELEASE? > > 5.14? 5.16? 5.,18? > > > > Which would be least painful? > > 5.16 (which is slated to become the default if I recall correctly). > > 5.18 has some interesting backwards incompatibilities.
Unless I am mistaken, perl-5.18 is not even in the ports system. Keeping it out simply because some applications may not be 100% compatible is going to cause more problems than it corrects. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
