On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:23:54PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From baptiste.darous...@gmail.com Tue Jun 25 15:20:11 2013 > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > From baptiste.darous...@gmail.com Tue Jun 25 14:52:59 2013 > >=20 > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: > > > I'm debugging X11 on sparc64. > > > I need to roll the ports tree back to 319054. > > > On downgrading pkg I get: > > > > > > > Running ldconfig > > > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib > > > > Registering installation for pkg-1.0.12_1 > > > pkg: warning: database version 19 is newer than libpkg(3) > version 12, = > but=3D > > still > > > compatible > > > pkg: sqlite: no such column: infos (pkgdb.c:1086) > > > pkg-static: warning: database version 19 is newer than > libpkg(3) versi= > on =3D > > 12, but > > > still compatible > > > Installing pkg-1.0.12_1...pkg-static: sqlite: table packages > has no co= > lum=3D > > n named > > > infos (pkgdb.c:1757) > > > pkg-static: sqlite: cannot rollback - no transaction is > active (pkgdb.= > c:2=3D > > 266) > > > *** Error code 70 > > > > > > Stop. > > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Shall I open a PR? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Anton > >=20 > > Why downgrading? Please upgrade again to 1.1.2 :) and report > bug if any. > >=20 > > Sorry, I don't get you. > >=20 > > I need the ports tree to be at 319054. > > I then do > >=20 > > pkg info -xd xorg-server > /root/xorg-dep > > portmaster -f `cat /root/xorg-dep` > >=20 > > Is this not supported? > > You mean you went forward and switch back to a former version? > > yes > > > Switching from 1.1 back to 1.0 has been taken in account during the > pkg-dev= > el > phase, but not considered for after 1.1 is offically released which > explain= > s why > you have this message. > > We could had the compatibility he really needed. > > Normal path is not to go backward :) > > ok, so what if I keep only ports-mgmt/pkg up to > date, and leave the rest of the ports tree at > 319054? Will this work, i.e. wil I be able > to use pkg tools with older portmaster? > Or maybe I need to keep both pkg and portmaster > up to date? Will this work?
Normally only keeping ports-mgmt/pkg up to date will work, however I will recommand anyway to keep portmaster uptodate either. regards, Bapt
pgp6VG3pN5hq2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
