21.06.2013 23:23, Lev Serebryakov пишет:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> I have old 9-STABEL eserver, which was converted to pkg-ng some time
> ago. This server has perl5.12, apache24, php53, some php modules, etc.
> installed via ports.
>
> I've tried to upgrade perl5.12 with recommended "portmaster -r perl"
> and it rebuild almost everything, including apache, php, all php
> modules, all apache modules, midnigght commander (mc) and lot more.
Well, for me it's not "all" at amount POV:
-----
% pkg info | wc -l
726
% pkg info -r perl | wc -l
234
-----
But that minority includes libreoffice, virtualbox, qt4-*, texlive,
xorg-*, firefox, thunderbird... So, I'd say effictivly it's really
almost all.
> Is it ok?
Technically "portmaster -r perl" rebuild all that depends on perl.
So you get what you asked for.
Should almost whole ports be rebuilded at a minor perl upgrade is
another question. And I think that the most resent change in perl
paths (the minor version was removed, i.e. 5.14.2 -> 5.14) is a step
in the right direction.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
