Hallo Julian H. Stacey,
> Nor me either, I tried all this to narrow it down:
> {
> I tried fvwm -debug & ls -ltr /var/log
> & tinkering with original RC file, & patching out bits of system.fvwmrc,
> assuming something failing around
It fails even with a very plain setup.
> but no luck, I didn't persevere, as I noted:
> cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm/files/ ; /bin/ls -1 | wc -l # 41
> cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm2/files/ ; /bin/ls -1 | wc -l # 2
> so wondered if you'd had problems feeding back to fvwm.org, & if I should
> just move to fvwm2 & customise from there ?
> > The buildlog doesn't differ enought.
> Differ from what ? another earlier that works ?
Buildlog on 8.3 (working) and 9.1
> The amd64 laptop I'm testing on has 3 boot partitions with 9.1-RELEASE,
> 9.0-RELEASE & 8.3-RELEASE I just re-installed Version 1.24r on all
> 3, & starting with both default /usr/local/lib/X11/fvwm/system.fvwmrc &
> my customised system.fvwmrc, I am seeing the same problem on all 6
> combinations of 3 x OS-version x 2 x RC files :
It may be a regression in some depedency ?
USE_XORG= xbitmaps xpm xext x11 xmu
As I don't have a problem on my FreeBSD 8.3 box with older X.
> I took a quick look at various bits of http://fvwm.org/
> Should we ask there ? Or would answer just be "Try 2.x"
Yes, 1.x ist "not supported" for some long time.
kind regards Dirk
- Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
