Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 22:13:16 Florent Peterschmitt a écrit :
> On 25/04/2013 22:03, David Demelier wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Currently the ports tree has unified ports for python and ruby modules
> > with
> > origin like databases/py-sqlalchemy. When someone wants to bulk the ports
> > tree to create packages the databases/py-sqlalchemy will only be built
> > against the current python version set in Mk/bsd.python.mk (or overriden
> > in make.conf).
> >
> > This is a very bad design and we should fix that as soon as possible, we
> > are a lot of people and some portmgr folks included that is not the best
> > way to manage python / ruby modules.
> >
> > Let say I want to install a package, unfortunately this one requires some
> > python modules that are only working for python 2.7 but me as a developer
> > I
> > want to develop with python 3, then we are stuck.
> >
> > What we need to do now, is to move *all* py-* and ruby-* to their
> > respective versions i.e py27-* and ruby19 (or 18?).
> >
> > Then we will need to copy all of these and set them to the newer version
> > so
> > py33 and ruby20.
> >
> > Also this will remove the breakage of OPTIONS, all of these ports needs
> > the
> > dirty hack of OPTIONSFILE because of the ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}.
> >
> > This will blow out the ports tree by adding a lot of ports, but it's the
> > best way to cover the both version and future bulk generation for users.
> >
> > Regards,
>
> I agree with you. I thought about a PYTHON_VERSION="27 33" variable in
> /etc/make.conf, generating each version of the module for each python
> version if the port is able to do it, but then you may build versions of
> module you don't need.
>
This is something I think about too, but I'm not sure if it will be easy to
generate make package creating two ones for each version?
And if a port requires a py- module but for a specific version, how is it
possible to share PYTHON_VERSION= through dependencies?
> But before (don't know when), it was like you say. py27-, py26, and
> everything merged to py-
>
> I was not as implied as now in FreeBSD project but it was surelly
> motivated by something.
--
David Demelier
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
