Le mardi 09 avril 2013 à 13:03 -0400, Robert Simmons a écrit : > > Hum, I didn't thought about that. So I think it would be possible to > > have a secondary « branch » for the distribution including something > > like « special ports » which can be retrieved, built and managed (for > > porters) quickly. > > > > Anybody think something like that is relevant and possible to do ? > > One thing to note is that these parts of base are kept just about as > up-to-date as ports over in the HEAD branch. In the case of OpenSSH, > HEAD is way way more up to date than ports. These changes are also > fairly quickly MFC'd over to stable. The real hiccup is that these > changes don't dribble out of freebsd-update.
I see. So you suggest to use -STABLE ? Because -RELEASE is aimed to stay as frozen (I mean stable and secured) as possible, it makes sens not to have updates. -- Florent Peterschmitt +33 (0)6 64 33 97 92 flor...@peterschmitt.fr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
