On 4 Mar 2013 01:38, "Eitan Adler" <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote:
>
> Some time ago ("2012-01-21 17:40:15 UTC") I committed a change which
> converted all uses of
>
> BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS}
> to
> BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS}
>
> Writing:
>
> ====
> At the moment 1385 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} and 450
> ports use BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS}. This patch fixes ports that
are
> currently broken. This is a temporary measure until we organically stop
using
> := or someone(s) spend a lot of time changing all the ports over.
>
> Explicit duplication > := > = and this just moves ports one step to the
left
> ====
>
> With the introduction of devel/ccache support this is now a more critical
issue:
>
> ports that use BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS} are buggy.
>
> Set WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes in /etc/make.conf and observe
>
> [10046 eitan@gravity (100)% ...n/fbsd/ports/editors/led ]%make
run-depends-list
> /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14
> [10047 eitan@gravity (100)% ...n/fbsd/ports/editors/led ]%vim Makefile
> # add "RUN_DEPENDS := ${BUILD_DEPENDS}
> [10048 eitan@gravity (100)% ...n/fbsd/ports/editors/led ]%make
run-depends-list
> /usr/ports/devel/ccache
> /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14
>
> Ports should *not* assume that BUILD_DEPENDS is clear when initiated
> and ports should explicitly duplicate RUN_DEPENDS.
Why not? When is ccache added to BUILD_DEPENDS? I guess I just don't see
how this can happen.
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
