On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:21:47PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
[...]
> >
>
> Baptiste,
> The original question is a functional change to Mk/*, which seems beneficial.
> The specificity of USE_FEATURE is in keeping with the
> long term goal of "> The very long term goal will be to switch as much code
> as
> > possible to be turn into a feature (when it makes sens of course)"
>
> A generic use of "USE" makes less clear for those developers and users that
> are familiar and maintain USE_${FEATURE} in their port.
> I appreciate the improvements that are being made, but small steps are easier
> for the large numbers of people that are familiar with
> the existing system.What is your suggestion, about the name of the macros, then? concerning the small steps, that is the plan, convert things small steps by small steps into features. > > Also are their any foreseeable adverse side-effects of making this change? Not that I know, and noone pointed me to an adverse side-effetcs yet. regards, bapt
pgp7q9zSlFySb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
