On 16 January 2013 20:48, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote: > On 11 September 2012 12:13, Olivier Smedts <oliv...@gid0.org> wrote: >> 2012/9/4 Bryan Drewery <br...@shatow.net>: >>>> My proposal: >>>> - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set >>>> - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE >>>> - flip the default right after the 9.1 release. > ... > > It has been months since I sent this mail without any official reply > whatsoever. At this point the exp-run machines are down and not > likely to return in the *near* future. > > Can I propose that this flag be flipped without an exp-run and fix the > fallout? It has been widely tested and has had exp-runs in the past.
I think this would be extremely hard to justify, given that the ports tree is a live entity. We would effectively be asking our end users to debug MAKE_JOBS. This is not acceptable; we can't plan to have fallout. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
