On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Olli Hauer <oha...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 2012-12-27 09:38, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>> While trying to build apache22 with ldap, the dependency apr1 passes a
>> "--without-ldap" flag to apr-util which results in apache
>> failing.
>>
>> * Background *
>> Some 450+ packages are built on a 4 monthly cycle, 149 of these are
>> controlled by ports.conf and built using portmaster. This is the
>> second time since 2005 that I've been stuck and would appreciate some
>> advice/guidance whether the problem lies with something in apr
>> that I am missing, or the use of ${UNIQUENAME}_SET doesn't work with new
>> OPTIONS_GROUP?
>>
>> We used a script to modify our ports.conf to accommodate the new optionng
>> _SET and _UNSET which worked nicely last time ports were
>> built.
>>
>> These are the relevant options from ports.conf
>> devel/apr1: WITH_THREADS | WITH_BDB | WITH_LDAP | WITHOUT_GDBM |
>> APR1_UNSET=GDBM | APR1_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP
> [...]
>
> I suspect here is the mistake
> $> cd devel/apr1
> $> make -V UNIQUENAME
> apr (-> not apr1)
>
> I don't work with portmaster (happy tinderbox user ;).
> Can you try the following line in your ports.conf
>
> file ports.conf: devel/apr1: WITH_THREADS | WITH_BDB | WITH_LDAP |
> WITHOUT_GDBM | APR_UNSET=GDBM | APR_SET=THREADS BDB LDAP
>
> --
> Regards,
> olli
Is there any particular reason why the UNIQUENAME couldn't just be the
name of the port in all cases? I would make writing the options in
optionsng format lot easier.
-Kimmo
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
