On 25/12/2012 1:55 PM, Matthew Rezny wrote: > The immediate question is, what was the original error that mandated the > workaround and does that error still occur with current version of Clang? If > the latter is no, can we get rid of the temporary workaround?
This may help provide some answers: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171542 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
