On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 09:49:53 +0200, Ján Šebošík wrote:
> ...
> >> +++ dict_ldap.c 2012-09-11 00:22:56.000000000 +0200
> >> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
> >> /*
> >> * SASL headers, for sasl_interact_t. Either SASL v1 or v2 should be
> >> fine.
> >> */
> >> -#include <sasl.h>
> >> +#include <sasl/sasl.h>
> >> #endif
> >
> > Rather, the idiomatic approach is to add ${LOCALBASE}/include/sasl to
> > the preprocessor's include path. This is done when WITH_SASL2 is
> > defined. Does that produce undesirable results in your environment?
>
> I'll test it probably today / tomorrow, and let you know later.
Can I assume this was resolved? Thanks.
--
Sahil Tandon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
