On 11 August 2012 18:10, Jordi Espasa Clofent <jespa...@minibofh.org> wrote:
> That's really strange. With a non-modified configure.in (which means that is
> containing this misplaced stanza), I did:
>
> # cd /usr/ports/security/tor/
> # make deinstall
> # make clean
> # make install
>
> and... voilá:
>
> mb# ldd /usr/local/bin/tor
> /usr/local/bin/tor:
>         libtcmalloc.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc.so.2 (0x2844e000)
>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x281aa000)
>         libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x281bc000)
>         libevent-2.0.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/event2/libevent-2.0.so.6
> (0x284b6000)
>         libssl.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x284f1000)
>         libcrypto.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x2853f000)
>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x281df000)
>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x28090000)
>         libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x286a1000)
>         libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x281f4000)
>
> So it seems the 'make clean' did some magic. According to man ports(7):
>
> clean            Remove the expanded source code.  This recurses to
>                  dependencies unless NOCLEANDEPENDS is defined.
>
> Should I understand it was some 'expanded source code' which was breaking my
> local ports tree?

make clean removes ${WRKDIR}, which is where the sources are extracted
(usually PORTSDIR/category/port/work).  No magic here ;)

Not sure what was going on here, but it may indicate that the
misplaced stanza doesn't have a catastrophic effect.  It's still wrong
though!

Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to