On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org>:
> > On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > ...
> >> It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was
> >> fixed by upstream now.  I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if anyone
> >> can try it out, and confirm it now allows you to build LibreOffice
> >> without this particular assertion, that would be great. :)
> >>
> >> Apply attached patch to your src tree, then build and install clang as
> >> follows (or just do a buildworld/installworld, if you have CPU to
> >> spare):
> >>
> >>   make -C /usr/src/lib/clang all
> >>   make -C /usr/src/usr.bin/clang/clang all install
> >>
> >> Then retry building the LibreOffice port.  Any feedback appreciated!
> >
> > Did anybody try this yet?  Unfortunately I don't have the resources to
> > build LibreOffice, so I cannot verify whether the fix I posted actually
> > works.
> 
> Yes, this works. Libreoffice 3.5.4 builds and installs at the first
> try with the clang assert patch and WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG.
> 
> Now Calc core dumps at me whereas it was working fine with 3.5.2, but
> I think that's another problem.
> 
> --
> Olivier Smedts                                                 _
>                                         ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
> e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X
> www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \
> 
>   "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
>   ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
>   et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Building with clang from ports on 9.0 amd64 and i386 (my desktops), I try calc
and it works, could the segfault be related to the fix?

regards,
Bapt

Attachment: pgpvtPZqc0lsf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to