Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:53:
On 3 July 2012 19:35, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-...@yandex.ru> wrote:
Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:22:
On 3 July 2012 12:51, Rodrigo OSORIO <rodr...@bebik.net> wrote:
Hi,
The port dev/icu fails to build in current due to an lock issue
caused by the use of threads api.
Disabling threads for icu in current solves the problem and the port
can be build successfully and AFAIK this unbroke some of the ports who
depends on icu.
I don't know if this can be an acceptable short-term workaround for this
por ?
I've been reliably informed that icu builds just fine on CURRENT from
1/July. I'll update my Tinderbox and let you know.
Chris
Can confirm that it builds without an issue on r237936 (Sun Jul 1 19:07:45
2012) with default option set (threads enabled).
Great.... now I need to find an appropriate OSVERSION for marking
BROKEN on; I'm tempted to start with 1000000 and end with 1000014; if
no-one yells at me I'll commit it in an hour or so.
Chris
Why to not just ask Rodrigo to update? I think this BROKEN is only
needed if icu doesn't builds on a system, that was installed from
official FreeBSD -current snapshot. If memory serves me well there is
many extra cautions in docs that using -current, csuped in wrong time,
may produce various problems, so "It's a -current, babe" should sound
reasonable, I believe.
Is there any extra info (error logs), or was you able to reproduce it on
some of your -current system?
Rodrigo, can you please update your system and check if problem is gone?
--
Regards,
Ruslan
Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"