On, Tue Jun 26, 2012, Mark Felder wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:50:48 -0500, Marcus von Appen <m...@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > I still do not see any reason or argument on why we would need > > sub-packages. > > I want up to date packages for all my servers. My servers all have > different requirements -- I want Apache with LDAP here, and definitely > Apache without LDAP there. Designing a package-building and deployment > system for a non-homogenous server farm is an exercise in futility. Having > proper sub-packages fixes this issue in a cleanly supportable fashion.
That sound good to me and something I'd vote for, since it does not split ports on a technical, but functional level into packages. Cheers Marcus
pgp7HNvIgfmrY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
