Le 28.05.2012 18:37, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
On 28.05.2012 18:18 (UTC+1), Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
Hi,
Here's just a status update.
I'm working on GDAL 1.9.1 update.
That's nice to hear.
I agree.
I plan to move perl/php/python/ruby bindings to separate ports.
It also removes dirty python hacks from the master port.
And the (slave) ports we would have to install additionally, if we want
the bindings? Sounds reasonable.
You consider gdal like a metaport ?
Needs also the java binding. What about the R-gdal and gdal-grass ports ?
BTW, it seems swig 1.3.40 is enough for GDAL 1.9.1.
So most people would only need 1.3.40 and not a parallel 2.0.x
installation.
I can build ruby-gdal successfully with swig 1.3.40 and ruby 1.9.
But I haven't tested if the generated shared libraries are OK.
Good luck also with MDB (java) and the shared libraries.
I will try to port some drivers :
- libgta http://gta.nongnu.org/gtatool.html
- ogdi http://ogdi.sourceforge.net/
- FileGDBAPI Esri
http://resources.arcgis.com/content/geodatabases/10.0/file-gdb-api (I
don't know about license...)
- RASDAMAN
http://rasdaman.eecs.jacobs-university.de/trac/rasdaman/wiki/Download
And also, what do you think about the recurring question about unixODBC
and libiodbc ?
Thanks for your works.
Loïc.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
