In message <20120409220442.ge90...@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin writes: > Hi, > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > upstream since 2008. > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able t > o > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have > a > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up.
I see no reason to keep php4. On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for now. I know of at least one port (www/gallery) which breaks under the latest PHP due to deprecated function calls which make a mess of websites using the port (warning messages that should go to a logfile are displayed on the webpage itself). I think these ports should be deprecated, giving users ample time to migrate to newer ports (e.g. migration of gallery to gallery3 is somewhat involved). -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
