>>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by >>> > eagle) >>> > >>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need >>> > an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14 >>> > version. >>> > >>> > Are there plans to update linux_base-f10 sometime this year ? >>> >>> Those which have the knowledge to produce a more recent linux_base >>> port, don't seem to have the time to do this. Those which tell to have >>> time and express interest to do this, seem to lose interest or time >>> when they get get aware of what needs to be done (see >>>
We can not run last Fedora 16 on FreeBSD - this is not possible, because Linux emulation is kernel 2.6.16 and Fedora needs in > 2.6.32 kernel ABI. I try this in FreeBSD 8.2 (I did a "draft of the port") # ./bash FATAL: kernel too old # file bash bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 -> 2.6.32 # ./bash Segmentation fault I think it should be apply to the CoreTeam What do you think about the CentOS? It may be more optimal to look on CentOS 6 userland port? -- Svyatoslav _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
