Hello, On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier <conr...@cox.net> wrote:
> I've been thinking for a long time that we need a better way to do > "make readmes", one that would be properly integrated into our > ports Mk infrastructure, to take advantage of make's ability to > recognize which files are up-to-date and which really do need > rebuilding. > > I like to make sure my README.html files are all up-to-date after my > nightly ports tree update, but with the current scheme, that means > either rebuilding *all* of the files in the tree, or (as I'm doing at > present) using some sort of "kludgey" (kludgy?) workaround. > > So people are actually using the readme files? Are many people using them? I ask because I *never* use them (unless they are used by 'make search'?), I always use freshports.org (BTW, thanks for an excellent service!) when I need to find out anything about a port. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
