On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/16/2011 15:49, Ted Hatfield wrote:
A quick google search shows
re-alpine
http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/develop
http://re-alpine.sourceforge.net/
The continuation of the Alpine email client from University of
Washington.
Maybe you would like to create a port.
My read of the differences between the existing Alpine port and the last
released version of re-alpine is that it's not worth disrupting the
currently stable port. If anyone feels differently, just let me know.
For me, I have not noticed any difference, but I may not have been
hitting any code that has changed significantly. I think the existing
port could easily use re-alpine's source without much change. The
binary is still alpine.
Of course, this could (should?) wait until 9 is out the door.
Sean
--
s...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
