On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:55:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm on 9-current r225756 amd64. Since the latest version of libreoffice
> was committed I always get stuck with cppunittest pegging the cpu at
> 100% and never completing. I've tried removing the port and letting
> libreoffice reinstall it as a dependency, no luck.
>
> Here's where I'm getting stuck:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> - start unit test #1 on library ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libcppu_ifcontainer.so
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> : &&
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mnt/local2/tmp/home/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.3.2/clone/ure/cppuhelper/unxfbsd.pro/lib:/mnt/local2/tmp/home/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.3.2/solver/340/unxfbsd.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}}
>
> /mnt/local2/tmp/home/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.3.2/solver/340/unxfbsd.pro/bin/cppunit/cppunittester
> ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libcppu_ifcontainer.so
> OK (5)
>
> And ktrace'ing the process gets endless repetition of this:
>
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x80083f720,0x7fffffff8030)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x80083f734,0)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x80083f720,0x7fffffff8030)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x80083f734,0)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x80083f720,0x7fffffff81f0)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x80083f734,0)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x80083f720,0x7fffffff81f0)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
> 46718 cppunittester CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x80083f734,0)
> 46718 cppunittester RET sigprocmask 0
>
> Which leads me to believe it's stuck in a loop somewhere.
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Doug
> Now idea at all about that, currently you are the only reporting that to me, i'll check with some upstream devs, hope they will have more ideas that I do regards, Bapt
pgprC7RHfQ4iX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
