Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 08/23/2011 08:22, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Hi There >> >> >> ist is like a bite in your own ass (dead lock): >> >> >> [UODATING]: The default ruby version has been updated to 1.9. Please rebuild >> all ports that >> >> >> >> [AMAROK] BROKEN= does not build with ruby 1.9 >> >> >> .... >> >> What To do? > > Don't upgrade ruby? Just because something is a new default doesn't mean > you have to upgrade to it. :) > > Of course you could also try portmaster and see if that would be a good > replacement for portupgrade, but that's another topic.
But tell me more: Is only portupgrade the reaosn for the new ruby? Heino _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
