On 2011-Jul-26 17:03:24 -0400, Wesley Shields <w...@atarininja.org> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >> No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is. > >Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is >the only time to bump PORTREVISION.
Another way of looking at it is: Should a user who has the port successfully installed rebuild the port, even though the distfile version hasn't changed. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpdoZpZTL7sJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
