-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/11 08:25, Tilman Keskinöz wrote: > > I shortly went through the list. > > There are currently 22 PRs filed against portupgrade > > Of these: > > 4 are general problems of the ports collection/pkg_tools. > (architecture-specific INDEX, Detecting of OPTIONs set, > Overriding/removing files changed by the user etc.) > > 2 are documentation bugs > > 1 wishlist item > > 4 contain patches > > 1 i believed is already fixed, i set to feedback. > > So this leaves the following, which need someone (a maintainer?) to > investigate/write a patch: >
<snip> > IMHO the situation is not that bad, that we need to DEPRECATE it. > Many thanks for going through them, that helps a great deal. I submitted some changes which should help with Ruby 1.9 compatibility, which Stanislav has pushed out to portupgrade-devel. I did some minimal testing with them, but they need more testing. If folks could test the updated portupgrade-devel, with both Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9, I'd appreciate it. That would help us get past the Ruby 1.9 compatibility issue. Thanks, Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOLqQ1AAoJEPXPYrMgexuhI0oH/RtLURpZgsANqGVs9QrQPn5W Haf9wt6sHnWa/1pXL9EoIUmEy8LPvRS9P4kFMwr8zNLtXjjK7ChhSALWApxoLgcE YsJND4ATcQun4mYCMxVECvvRM6egl1u/UmJGO3jOXJz6Dv0Ik5GB8y+3Ssepx5ls QIkEbXU+oXyq2pIsDajWLGBGEAPAOEaVphdLY9Hhvv+tQJDqlZHOkISVa6pqG4zM Kh7upMftP4ce53kC4CPupqXxK9m5OIo4/v+jbNzqmEkySk/CDZvN6qTSWGNVSH5r 20k6ggykmvqS6A7vmaYHxTdwtq1bn+J+YzryIOAyK9+VWVPLxbCMG8URRB8C2GY= =08aD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
