On Friday 01 July 2011 21:00:07 Rene Ladan wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to use ${CC} instead of cc in the above patch so
> that clang is also (a bit more) supported?no. please, read the whole logic to understand how it works. that check is done to support cc == clang, which means that clang is completely supported -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avi...@freebsd.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla The soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
