[ Subject changed to reflect new course of the discussion ]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:55AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> COMMENT
> 
> LICENSE
> 
> So license in a separate block; you can have several license lines
> making the MAINTAINER/COMMENT block unnecessarily large.

Agree here; space looks nice and natural.

> Not too sure about keeping _DEPENDS with USE; there're additional
> variables often set with USE, perhaps a block for _DEPENDS and then
> USE etc underneath? (could follow with USERS/GROUPS).

Yes, _DEPENDS first and USE_ below.  Of course, for complicated ports both
of them can be set downwards the Makefile depending on various conditions.

> LIB_DEPENDS=
> 
> BUILD_DEPENDS=
> 
> RUN_DEPENDS=

These three are normally not separated by extra blank line.  Also, I think
it makes more sense to list BUILD_DEPENDS first (think this: first come,
first go during the build (well, they normally stay, but can be purged after
build finishes).  LIB_DEPENDS come second (required for both build and
runtime), RUN_DEPENDS should be last.

Here I once again want to mention that recommended way (per PH)

    BUILD_DEPENDS=      ...
    RUN_DEPENDS:=       ${BUILD_DEPENDS)

is better that what people sometimes use to avoid dependency pollution bug:

    RUN_DEPENDS=        ...
    BUILD_DEPENDS=      RUN_DEPENDS

As the latter is unnatural (we build stuff before we run it).

> USE_FOO
> FOO_ARGS
> USE_BAR
> 
> USERS
> GROUPS

This is correct.

./danfe
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to