On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 15:15:54 PDT Jerry wrote:

If no one steps up claiming to need the port, then good riddance. If on
the other hand a user claims a valid use of the port, let them take
responsibility for it or find someone who will. Leaving intact ports
that either don't build, cannot be fetched, etcetera does not really
make a lot of sense.

No disagreement here.  Just now I ran a query on freshports and found
almost 5000 ports with maintainer=po...@freebsd.org.  That's way too
many!

My search for "popularity" metrics is intended to point me, as a
maintainer, to ports I might want to adopt now, rather than wait for
someone to complain about them.  Everything *I* use is already
maintained, so I've moved on to looking for things other people might
need.  But I don't want to waste my time on something that nobody uses.
:)

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to