on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper <gcoo...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for >>> API/ABI), >>> maybe more. >> >> This could be provided in the manifest. Doing it in the filename sort >> of turns into a mess, as I've discovered working at Cisco :). >> > > Actually, it *is* in the +MANIFEST of pkgng packages archives :-)
Well, by the package name I meant not only a package file name. Let's imagine that we do support installing i386 packages on amd64 in parallel to amd64 packages. And for some reason I want to have both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of, say, firefox; e.g. for benchmarking. If the packages would have the same name, then that would be impossible. I think that having some thing in package name in addition to package metadata could have certain benefits. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
