On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/16/2010 8:30 AM, Rob Farmer wrote: > >What is the best practice for no-op port updates - i.e. version 1.0 > >and 1.1 produce identical FreeBSD packages but they might be different > >on Linux/elsewhere? Update to have to port appear "current" or avoid > >forcing people to do unnecessary updates? > > When faced with similar situations in the past I have chosen not to > update, until the whinging became too extreme. :) This is one of > those where there is no "right" answer.
I've sometimes added a comment to the port's Makefile explaining the needlessness of an update. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@space.bg r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence was in the past tense.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
