jhell <jh...@dataix.net> wrote: > ... Mercurial being the distributed version control that it is > allows you to clone, make the changes you need to the clone test it > thoroughly and then either push or pull them to the main tree ...
At the risk of starting the VCS variant of the vi vs emacs wars :) why Mercurial (rather than, say, GIT or SVK)? And no, I have nothing against Mercurial. I don't know _any_ distributed VCS well enough to have an opinion of which would be best suited. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
