on 17/09/2010 12:49 Steven Hartland said the following: > > My experience is no this is no longer the case at least on stable + patches > mentioned on thread:- > "zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?"
And at least one of those is a patch to prevent ZFS from giving memory too eagerly. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
