On 08/06/2010 05:44, Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
> Thank you for your answer (and everyone else who replied). This is
> exactly the reason why I keep going back to portupgrade. Default
> OPTIONS almost always work for me - if not I go to the ports directory
> and run make config then let the --batch option of portinstall deal
> with everything.
>
> It would be extremely nice if there would be a --batch option that
> would act like portupgrade.
Now that you've been more specific about what you want, I have good news
for you. :) In the current development version of portmaster I have
revamped the -G option so that it acts more like BATCH=YES in the sense
that it specifically skips all OPTIONS dialogs. Therefore you should be
able to accomplish at least this part of what you want with -G alone,
without using BATCH=YES at all.
I plan to commit the update very soon, hopefully this weekend. I'm
currently doing an extensive code review/whitespace realignment/etc.
hth,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
