-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/2010 08:53:53, Matthew Seaman wrote: > So, you're creating your own meta-port that exists only to be depended > on by the ports you specifically want to have installed? That's a > really good idea. You might need to fill out the contents of your > "wanted-ports" meta-port a bit more, but the concept seems sound to me.
Actually, I thought this was a good enough idea that I had a go at implementing it. My first cut at doing this is available at: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/wanted-ports.shar What do people think? Unless this meets with utter horror or there are some horrendous bugs, I'll tidy it up, add a man page and submit it as a new port in a week or so. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwORVYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzwegCaAhV/gRXkKLkjD7627SrkJGho hJ0AnjNI9kVYN8h4xVgg9gtq9XO+JeRT =lygQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"